Divergent Compute.AI Economic Think Tank

Markets / Industries / Pharma & Biotech

Industry view · Pharma & Biotech

The first AI-designed drugs cleared the clinic; now the money is chasing proof

2025 was the year AI in drug discovery moved from slideware to clinical readouts: the first molecule with both target and compound designed by AI posted a positive Phase IIa, and capital followed at scale, with Isomorphic Labs raising $2.1B in May 2026. But the inconvenient truth is that AI has yet to dent the industry's ~90% end-to-end clinical failure rate, and most of the value is still a 2030 promise, not a 2026 fact.

~$3.1B
AI drug-discovery market, 2025
GM Insights
$50-70B
Gen-AI value in pharma R&D by 2030
McKinsey
173
AI-origin programs in clinical dev (2026)
Axis Intelligence
80-90%
AI-discovered drug Phase I success vs ~50%
2 Minute Medicine

01 · The thesis

Compute and chemistry are converging, but biology still fails late

The bull case rests on a real inflection. AlphaFold has predicted 200M+ protein structures, generative models now design antibodies and small molecules de novo, and AI-native pipelines report Phase I success near 80-90% against a historical ~50%. Big pharma is no longer dabbling: Eli Lilly is standing up an AI factory on 1,016 Nvidia Blackwell Ultra GPUs (>9,000 petaflops) and has signed 16 AI deals since 2025, including a $2.75B pact with Insilico Medicine.

The bear case is that the bottleneck was never the early stages. Discovery and Phase I are where AI helps most, yet roughly 70% of R&D spend and the bulk of attrition sit in late-stage development, where AI has not moved the ~90% failure rate. The market is also small relative to the hype — on the order of $3-4B in 2025-2026 — meaning today's valuations price a future that still has to clear Phase II and III. The next two years separate platforms with assets from platforms with decks.

1Target ID

Where AI bites first

Foundation models on omics and structure data nominate and validate targets that were previously intractable.

AlphaFold, Recursion maps, Insilico PandaOmics
2Molecule design

Generative chemistry is real

De novo design of small molecules and antibodies compresses hit-to-lead from years to months.

Isomorphic, Schrodinger, Xaira (RFdiffusion)
3Preclinical

In-silico screening

Surrogate models predict ADMET, toxicity and binding, trimming wet-lab cycles before candidates advance.

Schrodinger physics-ML, Nvidia BioNeMo
4Clinical trials

The unbroken wall

AI speeds patient matching, site selection and statistical programming, but has not improved late-stage success.

Agentic-AI trial ops, Tempus, sponsors
5Regulatory

Framework forming

FDA's Jan-2025 draft guidance on AI in regulatory decisions begins to define how models support submissions.

FDA, sponsors' reg-affairs teams
Pace of AI disruption by stage — Divergent Compute assessment

02 · Public players & exposure

Who routes through, who gets routed around

We plot the listed players on two editorial axes — how exposed each is to AI disruption, against how ready its data, brand and position are to be the answer. The figures in the table are sourced; the placement is our read.

Positioning — editorial assessment, not a sourced metric. Bubble = approximate relative scale.
CompanyStanceThe sourced fact
Eli LillyLLYCompute incumbentBuilding an AI factory (LillyPod) on 1,016 Nvidia Blackwell Ultra GPUs (>9,000 petaflops) and has signed 16 AI deals since 2025, including a $2.75B pact with Insilico (CNBC, Fierce Biotech).
Roche / GenentechRHHBYPlatform builderGenentech runs a 'lab-in-a-loop' generative-AI platform with Nvidia and is launching a hybrid-cloud AI factory to industrialise discovery (pharmaphorum, MobiHealthNews).
Isomorphic Labspvt-ISOBest-funded nativeRaised $2.1B in May 2026 (Series B led by Thrive, after $600M in 2025) and holds Lilly/Novartis deals worth nearly $3B; preparing first clinical trials of AI-designed drugs (Forbes, Fortune).
SchrodingerSDGRPhysics-ML pickIts Nimbus-originated TYK2 inhibitor zasocitinib (TAK-279) advanced into Phase III, validating physics-enabled design at late stage (ScienceDirect 2025 landscape).
Insilico Medicinepvt-ISMFirst clinical proofRentosertib, the first drug with AI-designed target and molecule, posted +98mL FVC vs -20mL placebo in Phase IIa (Nature Medicine); cumulative collaboration value $4.6B (Insilico).
RecursionRXRXConsolidation testMerged with Exscientia in a ~$688M all-stock deal but cut/paused several programs to limit 2025 burn, with cash runway into 2027 (Pharmaceutical Technology, pharmaphorum).
Xaira Therapeuticspvt-XAIShow-me moneyLaunched in 2024 with $1B from ARCH and Foresite, among the largest initial commitments in ARCH's history, but is still pre-clinical (Fierce Biotech, TechCrunch).
AbCelleraABCLEngine, few hitsIts AI platform helped identify Lilly's COVID antibody bamlanivimab rapidly, but it has struggled to convert the engine into a deep wholly-owned pipeline (BioSpace).
NvidiaNVDAPicks & shovelsIts BioNeMo platform underpins pharma AI factories with Lilly, Roche, Genentech, AstraZeneca, GSK and Novo Nordisk, plus a $1B+ Lilly co-innovation lab (Nvidia, Fierce Biotech).
Tempus AITEMData flywheelSupplies multimodal clinical-genomic data and AI to pharma for trial enrollment and target work, monetising real-world data the discovery platforms lack (company filings, 2025 trial reviews).
The map is Divergent Compute’s editorial positioning, offered as a lens, not a measurement. Every figure in the right-hand column is drawn from a named source — see Sources.

03 · The two clocks

The spend, and the payoff

Three clocks the industry is racing against

Disclosed raises and deal values; milestone-laden pacts shown at headline figure. Sources: Forbes, TechCrunch, Fierce Biotech, CNBC, pharmaphorum.

The proof clock. The first AI-origin drug, Insilico's Rentosertib, cleared Phase IIa with a +98mL forced-vital-capacity gain versus a -20mL placebo decline — but Phase II success for AI drugs still sits near 40%, statistically no better than traditional methods. The next 18 months of Phase II/III readouts decide whether the early-stage edge survives biology.

The capital clock. Money is arriving faster than assets mature: Isomorphic's $2.1B raise, Xaira's $1B launch and Lilly's $2.75B Insilico pact are bets on platforms that, in most cases, have yet to register an approval. Cash runways — Recursion's stretches into 2027 — set hard deadlines for clinical validation.

The compute clock. Infrastructure is being poured now: Lilly's 1,016-GPU AI factory and Nvidia BioNeMo deals across Roche, AstraZeneca, GSK and Novo Nordisk mean the discovery engine is scaling years ahead of the regulatory framework, which the FDA only began drafting in January 2025.

04 · Private flagships

The AI-native challengers

The companies attacking this industry AI-first, with disclosed funding where available:

Isomorphic Labs

DeepMind spin-out, AI-first discovery

Co-developed AlphaFold 3; aims to design drugs for any target and is moving its own programs toward first-in-human trials.

$2.1B raised May 2026 (Series B led by Thrive); ~$3B in Lilly/Novartis partnerships (Forbes, PR Newswire)

Insilico Medicine

End-to-end generative pipeline

Delivered the first clinical proof-of-concept for a fully AI-designed drug and listed on the Hong Kong exchange in Dec 2025.

$292M Hong Kong IPO Dec 2025 (2025's largest HK biotech listing); cumulative collaboration value $4.6B (Insilico, pharmaphorum)

Schrodinger

Physics-based + ML design

Combines first-principles molecular simulation with ML; its TYK2 program reached Phase III via partner Takeda.

Public (Nasdaq: SDGR); software + co-discovery royalty model (ScienceDirect)

Xaira Therapeutics

Protein-design native (Baker lab)

Built on RFdiffusion/RFantibody to design antibodies and proteins from scratch; led by ex-Genentech's Tessier-Lavigne.

$1B launch in 2024 from ARCH, Foresite, Sequoia, NEA and others (TechCrunch)

Recursion

Phenomics + automated biology

Industrialised cell-image screening; post-Exscientia merger it pruned to a focused ~10-program pipeline with big-pharma milestones.

Public (Nasdaq: RXRX); cash runway into 2027 (Pharmaceutical Technology, pharmaphorum)

Nvidia BioNeMo

AI infrastructure layer

The de-facto compute and model platform under most large-pharma AI factories, turning drug discovery into a buyer of GPUs.

$1B+ Lilly co-innovation lab; partnerships with Roche, AZ, GSK, Novo (Nvidia)

05 · Signals

What moved, and what to watch

Jan 2025

FDA drafts AI guidance

The FDA published its first framework for using AI to support regulatory decisions across the drug lifecycle, beginning to formalise the rules of the game.

Mid 2025

First AI-origin Phase IIa win

Insilico's Rentosertib posted positive idiopathic-pulmonary-fibrosis data in Nature Medicine — the first clinical proof for an AI-designed target and molecule.

Oct 2025

Lilly builds a pharma supercomputer

Eli Lilly and Nvidia announced an AI factory on 1,016 Blackwell Ultra GPUs, signalling that incumbents intend to own the compute, not rent it.

May 2026

Isomorphic's $2.1B raise

The largest single financing in AI drug discovery to date reset the funding ceiling and validated the DeepMind-origin platform thesis.

2026

173 AI programs in the clinic

AI-origin clinical candidates scaled from a handful a decade ago to 173 in 2026, shifting the debate from 'can AI design drugs' to 'will they survive Phase II/III'.

06 · The exposure read

Who’s defensible, who’s at risk

AI rewards clean, structured advantage and punishes friction. The line runs through who owns the data, the brand and the customer — and who is merely a step the technology can route around.

Defensible

  • Compute and tooling vendors capture value regardless of which drug wins — Nvidia's BioNeMo sits under Lilly, Roche, AZ, GSK and Novo, monetising the whole sector's AI buildout.
  • Cash-rich incumbents like Eli Lilly and Roche, which can own AI factories, sign multiple platform deals and absorb attrition that would sink a single-asset startup.
  • Platforms with clinical proof — Insilico and Schrodinger — that have pushed AI-origin molecules into Phase II/III and can point to data, not just decks.
  • Data-advantaged players such as Tempus, whose multimodal real-world datasets feed trial design and target work the pure-discovery shops cannot replicate.

At risk

  • Sub-scale AI-native biotechs burning eight figures a year with no approved asset; Recursion's 2027 runway shows the clock even well-funded names face.
  • Engine-without-pipeline companies like AbCellera, whose discovery tech is strong but whose wholly-owned clinical portfolio remains thin.
  • Investors pricing 2030 value today, exposed if Phase II/III readouts confirm AI's edge fades past the early stages where the ~90% failure rate still rules.
  • Late-development cost centers unprotected by AI — the 70% of R&D spend in trials where models have so far delivered efficiency, not better odds of approval.
The decisive question for 2026-2027 is not whether AI can design a drug — it can — but whether AI-origin molecules survive the late-stage biology that has always been pharma's graveyard. Capital and compute are betting yes; the data has not yet closed the case.

Sources

Where this comes from

GM Insights — AI in Drug Discovery Market  ·  McKinsey — Generative AI in pharma  ·  Forbes — Isomorphic Labs' $2.1B fundraise  ·  PR Newswire — Isomorphic Labs $2.1B funding  ·  CNBC — Eli Lilly & Nvidia supercomputer  ·  NVIDIA — Lilly AI factory DGX SuperPOD (1,016 GPUs)  ·  Fierce Biotech — Lilly-Nvidia $1B lab  ·  Pharmaceutical Technology — Recursion pipeline cuts  ·  pharmaphorum — Exscientia-Recursion $688M merger  ·  pharmaphorum — Insilico $293M Hong Kong IPO  ·  Insilico — Nature Medicine Phase IIa rentosertib  ·  2 Minute Medicine — AI drugs 90% Phase I  ·  ScienceDirect — How successful are AI-discovered drugs in clinical trials?  ·  TechCrunch — Xaira $1B launch